Bloch v. Pilgrim Psychiatric Center

New York Court of Appeals

Bloch v. Pilgrim Psychiatric Center

75 N.Y.2d 789

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 4, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 75 N.Y.2d 789 (Bloch v. Pilgrim Psychiatric Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bloch v. Pilgrim Psychiatric Center, 75 N.Y.2d 789 (N.Y. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Treating plaintiffs’ papers as an appeal as of right, on the court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the grounds that a direct appeal from a court of original instance does not lie where questions other than the constitutionality of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]), and that the Appellate Division order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Treating plaintiffs’ papers as a motion for leave to appeal, motion dismissed upon the grounds that this court does not have jurisdiction to entertain a motion for leave to appeal from an order of a court of original instance absent basis for leave to appeal pursuant to CPLR 5602 (a) (1) (ii), and that the Appellate Division order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Treating plaintiffs’ papers as an appeal as of right, on the court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the grounds that a direct appeal from a court of original instance does not lie where questions other than the constitutionality of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]), and that the Appellate Division order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Treating plaintiffs’ papers as a motion for leave to appeal, motion dismissed upon the grounds that this court does not have jurisdiction to entertain a motion for leave to appeal from an order of a court of original instance absent basis for leave to appeal pursuant to CPLR 5602 (a) (1) (ii), and that the Appellate Division order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 N.Y.2d 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloch-v-pilgrim-psychiatric-center-ny-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack