Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bloch v. DiLorenzo

Bloch v. DiLorenzo

44 So. 3d 1290, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15548, 2010 WL 3984691
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 13, 2010
Docket4D09-3803
StatusPublished

This text of 44 So. 3d 1290 (Bloch v. DiLorenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloch v. DiLorenzo, 44 So. 3d 1290, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15548, 2010 WL 3984691 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order confirming an arbitration award and dismissing appellant’s “counterclaim.” Appellant’s contract with appellee included a provision requiring arbitration of any disputes. The parties arbitrated, and the arbitrators entered their findings and award. The “counterclaim,” opposing the award and arbitration proceeding, was filed six months after the entry of the award. Not only was this pleading untimely, see § 682.13(2), Florida Statutes, but it also failed to raise grounds upon which the award could be vacated. See § 682.13(1), Fla. Stat.

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LO v. State
44 So. 3d 1290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 So. 3d 1290, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15548, 2010 WL 3984691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloch-v-dilorenzo-fladistctapp-2010.