Bloch v. Commissioner
42 F.2d 1013, 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 14, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4387, 1930 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9507, 9 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 14
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 16, 1930
DocketNo. 2998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 42 F.2d 1013 (Bloch v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bloch v. Commissioner, 42 F.2d 1013, 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 14, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4387, 1930 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9507, 9 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 14 (4th Cir. 1930).
Opinion
Affirmed on the authority of Heiner v. Tindle, 276 U. S. 582, 48 S. Ct. 326, 72 L. Ed. 714, and Nichols v. Smith (C. C. A. 1st) 35 F.(2d) 938.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Morrisdale Coal Co. v. Commissioner
97 F.2d 272 (Third Circuit, 1938)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 F.2d 1013, 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 14, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4387, 1930 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9507, 9 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloch-v-commissioner-ca4-1930.