B.L.J. v. State
678 So. 2d 530, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9257, 1996 WL 496305
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 4, 1996·No. No. 95-3485·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinions
We reverse the judgment holding appellant in indirect criminal contempt of court because the order to show cause was not “based upon an affidavit or sworn testimony of an individual having personal knowledge of the essential facts.” Hunt v. State, 659 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). We do not intend by this opinion to preclude the initi[531] ation of new proceedings, provided that the requirements of Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.150(b) are satisfied.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
B.L.J. v. State, 678 So. 2d 530, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9257, 1996 WL 496305 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
678 So. 2d 530 (B.L.J. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
A. N. W. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Senterfitt v. Oaks
775 So. 2d 431 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Dixon v. State
678 So. 2d 530 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)