Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/B.L.J. v. State

B.L.J. v. State

678 So. 2d 530, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9257, 1996 WL 496305
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 4, 1996
DocketNo. 95-3485
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 678 So. 2d 530 (B.L.J. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B.L.J. v. State, 678 So. 2d 530, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9257, 1996 WL 496305 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the judgment holding appellant in indirect criminal contempt of court because the order to show cause was not “based upon an affidavit or sworn testimony of an individual having personal knowledge of the essential facts.” Hunt v. State, 659 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). We do not intend by this opinion to preclude the initi[531]*531ation of new proceedings, provided that the requirements of Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.150(b) are satisfied.

REVERSED.

MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur. LAWRENCE, J., specially concurs with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A. N. W. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Senterfitt v. Oaks
775 So. 2d 431 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Dixon v. State
678 So. 2d 530 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
678 So. 2d 530, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9257, 1996 WL 496305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blj-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.