Blizzard v. . Moore

144 S.E. 925, 196 N.C. 807, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 410
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 17, 1928
StatusPublished

This text of 144 S.E. 925 (Blizzard v. . Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blizzard v. . Moore, 144 S.E. 925, 196 N.C. 807, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 410 (N.C. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There was a conflict between the evidence offered by-plaintiff and that offered by defendants with respect to the contract entered into between the parties. The judge’s charge is not contained in the record, and it is therefore to be assumed that he correctly instructed the jury upon every phase of the ease. An issue of fact was thus drawn for the determination of the jury, and the verdict therefore determines the merits of the case.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 S.E. 925, 196 N.C. 807, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blizzard-v-moore-nc-1928.