Blizniak v. Blizniak

73 A.D.2d 1050, 425 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10011
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 24, 1980·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Inasmuch as the Nevada divorce decree contained no provision for alimony, Family Court was without power to modify it to include an award of alimony (Matter of Silver v Silver, 36 NY2d 324; see, also, Beaverson v Beaverson, 72 AD2d 963). Our affirmance is without prejudice, however, to plaintiff bringing an action for a separation or divorce in which she seeks an award of alimony (see Domestic Relations Law, § 236). The prior finding that the Nevada decree is binding on the plaintiff insofar as it determines marital status would not preclude such action (see Janowski v Janowski, 58 AD2d 980). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court—alimony.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blizniak v. Blizniak, 73 A.D.2d 1050, 425 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

73 A.D.2d 1050 (Blizniak v. Blizniak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steele v. Rose
309 A.D.2d 1242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Pearson v. Pearson
108 A.D.2d 402 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)