Bliss v. Village of Baldwinsville

31 Misc. 739, 66 N.Y.S. 1127
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1900·Published

Opinion

Hiscock, J.

Judgment is ordered for defendant upon the ground that Baldwin and Ostrander completed the building contracted to be built for defendant by Jennie Van Dusen, under an arrangement with said defendant to so complete it for the moneys unpaid on said contract when abandoned by said Van Dusen, and save themselves from liability as her bondsmen; that defendant had the right under such arrangement to pay to said Baldwin and Ostrander the amount not earned under said contract when abandoned as aforesaid and which moneys plaintiffs seek to reach in this action. McChesney v. City of Syracuse, 75 Hun, 503.

Judgment for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bliss v. Village of Baldwinsville, 31 Misc. 739, 66 N.Y.S. 1127 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

31 Misc. 739 (Bliss v. Village of Baldwinsville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McChesney v. City of Syracuse
27 N.Y.S. 508 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)