Bliss v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Bliss v. Stevens

551 N.W.2d 919, 1996 Minn. LEXIS 338, 1996 WL 496341

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 17, 1996

DocketNo. C4-95-1821

StatusPublished

This text of 551 N.W.2d 919 (Bliss v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bliss v. Stevens, 551 N.W.2d 919, 1996 Minn. LEXIS 338, 1996 WL 496341 (Mich. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Dr. Sheridan Stevens for further review of the February 27, 1996 decision of the court of appeals be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of reversing that decision and reinstating the judgment of dismissal of the plaintiff Michelle D. Bliss’ action entered in the Hennepin County District Court. This record does not disclose any genuine issue of material fact as to whether the plaintiff had “reason to believe” that the defendant was residing in Hennepin County at the time of service so as to render valid and timely, the delivery of the summons and complaint to the Hennepin County Sheriff for service on the defendant.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alexander M. Keith Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Dr. Sheridan Stevens for further review of the February 27, 1996 decision of the court of appeals be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of reversing that decision and reinstating the judgment of dismissal of the plaintiff Michelle D. Bliss’ action entered in the Hennepin County District Court. This record does not disclose any genuine issue of material fact as to whether the plaintiff had “reason to believe” that the defendant was residing in Hennepin County at the time of service so as to render valid and timely, the delivery of the summons and complaint to the Hennepin County Sheriff for service on the defendant.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alexander M. Keith Chief Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

551 N.W.2d 919, 1996 Minn. LEXIS 338, 1996 WL 496341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bliss-v-stevens-minn-1996.