Bliss v. Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Bliss v. Smith

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 28

DecidedJuly 1, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 28 (Bliss v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bliss v. Smith, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 28 (Ohio Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

HOUCK, J.

1. Where plaintiff took judgment on a cog-novit note, defendant by filing motion to set aside judgment in trial court, entered appearance.

2. Where plaintiff took judgment on cog-novit note, court was authorized to vacate and suspend judgment and give defendant opportunity to tender answer and file same, if it contained defense in law, and have case heard on merits.

(Shields and Sayre, JJ., concur.)

For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOUCK, J.

1. Where plaintiff took judgment on a cog-novit note, defendant by filing motion to set aside judgment in trial court, entered appearance.

2. Where plaintiff took judgment on cog-novit note, court was authorized to vacate and suspend judgment and give defendant opportunity to tender answer and file same, if it contained defense in law, and have case heard on merits.

(Shields and Sayre, JJ., concur.)

For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bliss-v-smith-ohioctapp-1926.