Bliss v. Long

Ohio Supreme Court

Bliss v. Long

5 Ohio 337

DecidedDecember 15, 1832

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ohio 337 (Bliss v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bliss v. Long, 5 Ohio 337 (Ohio 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court :

By the transcript now exhibited, it appears the court of common pleas, since the last continuance of this case, has retaxed the costs, and rejected from the judgment six dollars and five cents, by mistake of the clerk, included in it. The bond is now in double the amount of the judgment in the court of common pleas, and sufficient. The motion being now without any foundation is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

By the transcript now exhibited, it appears the court of common pleas, since the last continuance of this case, has retaxed the costs, and rejected from the judgment six dollars and five cents, by mistake of the clerk, included in it. The bond is now in double the amount of the judgment in the court of common pleas, and sufficient. The motion being now without any foundation is overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Ohio 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bliss-v-long-ohio-1832.