Bliss v. Benedict

Nebraska Supreme Court

Bliss v. Benedict

24 Neb. 346

DecidedJuly 15, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 24 Neb. 346 (Bliss v. Benedict) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bliss v. Benedict, 24 Neb. 346 (Neb. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Maxwell, J.

The questions presented in this case are substantially the same as in Peru Plow & Wheel Co., just decided, an additional ground of attachment being that defendant had absconded so that summons could not be served upon him, etc. The proof entirely fails to sustain this charge, or any of the charges set forth in the affidavit.

The judgment of the district court is right, and is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maxwell, J.

The questions presented in this case are substantially the same as in Peru Plow & Wheel Co., just decided, an additional ground of attachment being that defendant had absconded so that summons could not be served upon him, etc. The proof entirely fails to sustain this charge, or any of the charges set forth in the affidavit.

The judgment of the district court is right, and is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 Neb. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bliss-v-benedict-neb-1888.