Blinbaum v. Union Marine & General Insurance
This text of 5 Misc. 2d 645 (Blinbaum v. Union Marine & General Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although the policy issued by Northern was prior to the date of the policy issued by Union Marine, the latter policy was the specific one, insuring, as it did, against a specific peril. The court below, therefore, correctly followed the declaration of the Court of Appeals that insurance may be specific because it insures against a specific peril. (Davis Yarn Co. v. Brooklyn Yarn Dye Co., 293 N. Y. 236.)
The orders appealed from were properly made.
The judgment and orders should be affirmed, with $10 costs.
Eder, Heoht and Tilzer, JJ., concur.
Judgment and orders affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Misc. 2d 645, 158 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blinbaum-v-union-marine-general-insurance-nyappterm-1956.