Bligen v. Kelly
This text of 126 A.D.2d 989 (Bligen v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously reversed, on the law, in accordance with the following memorandum: It was error to settle this record to include the record from an unrelated proceeding. "It is axiomatic that appellate review is limited to the record made at nisi prius and, absent matters which may be judicially noticed, new facts may not be injected at the appellate level (People ex rel. Martinez v Walters, 99 AD2d 476, 477; Block v Nelson, 71 AD2d 509; Matter of Wish Realty Corp. v Starr, 56 AD2d 656).” (Broida v Bancroft, 103 AD2d 88, 93). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.—art 78.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 A.D.2d 989, 511 N.Y.S.2d 985, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bligen-v-kelly-nyappdiv-1987.