Blick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

474 F. App'x 932
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 14, 2012·No. No. 12-1431·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kathleen Blick and Harold Blick appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss their action to quiet title in real property. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellants’ brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:11-cv-00081-NKM-RSB, 2012 WL 1030137 (W.D.Va. Mar. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 474 F. App'x 932 (4th Cir. 2012).

474 F. App'x 932 (Blick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related