Blick v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

Fourth Circuit

Blick v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

591 F. App'x 231

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 4, 2015·No. No. 14-1953·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harold,Blick appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant on the basis of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blick v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., No. 3:14-cv-00022-NKM, 2014 WL 4052820 (W.D.Va. Aug. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harold,Blick appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant on the basis of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blick v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., No. 3:14-cv-00022-NKM, 2014 WL 4052820 (W.D.Va. Aug. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Blick v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., 591 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

591 F. App'x 231 (Blick v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.