Blice v. Goggin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blice v. Goggin

157 A.D. 901, 141 N.Y.S. 1109

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A.D. 901 (Blice v. Goggin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blice v. Goggin, 157 A.D. 901, 141 N.Y.S. 1109 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, First. That the determination of the Special Term that plaintiff did not purchase the mortgage but paid the same to discharge her debt to defendant, John B. Goggin, is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. Second. That entry of judgment upon the memorandum or opinion of the justice presiding at the trial without formal findings was irregular and unauthorized. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, First. That the determination of the Special Term that plaintiff did not purchase the mortgage but paid the same to discharge her debt to defendant, John B. Goggin, is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. Second. That entry of judgment upon the memorandum or opinion of the justice presiding at the trial without formal findings was irregular and unauthorized. All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A.D. 901, 141 N.Y.S. 1109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blice-v-goggin-nyappdiv-1913.