B.L.G. v. State

928 So. 2d 461, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6856, 2006 WL 1375093
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 2006·No. No. 5D06-1447·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

B.L.G., a juvenile, petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that she is being unlawfully detained in secure detention despite a risk assessment instrument score of zero, and that she does not otherwise satisfy the requisites for secure detention. We agree and grant the petition.

On April 27, 2006, the juvenile, who was charged with violating her probation, was placed in secure detention for a period not to exceed 21 days. The judge did not provide any written reasons explaining why he selected a more restrictive placement than that indicated by the risk assessment instrument. If a child has been charged with violating probation, he or she may continue to be held in a consequence unit or home detention upon order of the court, but in the absence of additional clear and convincing reasons the child may not be placed in secure detention. See § 985.215(2)(h) and (j), Fla. Stat. (2005). Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby granted and petitioner shall be immediately released from secure detention. See T.D.S. v. State, 922 So.2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); C.D.T. v. State, 920 So.2d 787 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, TORPY, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B.L.G. v. State, 928 So. 2d 461, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6856, 2006 WL 1375093 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

928 So. 2d 461 (B.L.G. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Department of Juvenile Justice v. S.M.
131 So. 3d 780 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)
Johnson v. State
928 So. 2d 461 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)