Bleznak ex rel. Alan D. Bleznak 2005 Life Insurance Trust v. Alston & Bird, LLP

511 F. App'x 73
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 2013
DocketNo. 12-1999
StatusPublished

This text of 511 F. App'x 73 (Bleznak ex rel. Alan D. Bleznak 2005 Life Insurance Trust v. Alston & Bird, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bleznak ex rel. Alan D. Bleznak 2005 Life Insurance Trust v. Alston & Bird, LLP, 511 F. App'x 73 (2d Cir. 2013).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Patricia Royston, as trustee of the Alan D. Bleznak 2005 Life Insurance Trust (the “Trust”), appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Jones, /.), granting summary judgment in favor of Lancier Group, L.L.C. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.

After an involved series of insurance transactions, the Trust seeks to recover from Lancier Group the commission paid by the Trust for the sale of certain life insurance policies owned by the Trust. The Trust sued Lancier Group for conversion and restitution, among other things, essentially challenging the validity of the assignment to Lancier Group of contracts entitling it to a commission for the sale of the policies. Because Lancier Group was lawfully entitled to the commission, the district court properly granted Lancier Group summary judgment.

The Trust argues that the agreements entitling Lancier Group to commission were not subject to the UCC and therefore not properly transferred to Lancier Group. However, under ordinary principles of contract law, Lancier Group was validly assigned the rights and obligations under the agreements, regardless of whether the sale was required to be conducted in accordance with the procedures of the UCC. In any event, the Trust expressly and implicitly ratified Lancier’s assumption of the rights and obligations under the agreements.

For the foregoing reasons, and finding no merit in the Trust’s other arguments, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 F. App'x 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bleznak-ex-rel-alan-d-bleznak-2005-life-insurance-trust-v-alston-bird-ca2-2013.