Bleything v. Bleything

Oregon Supreme Court

Bleything v. Bleything

170 P. 305, 87 Or. 197, 1918 Ore. LEXIS 269

DecidedJanuary 22, 1918

StatusPublished

This text of 170 P. 305 (Bleything v. Bleything) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bleything v. Bleything, 170 P. 305, 87 Or. 197, 1918 Ore. LEXIS 269 (Or. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

[198]*198Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice McBride.

1. There are no new questions of law raised upon this appeal, and to discuss the evidence would only be. to recount the childish bickerings of two young people who, by the exercise of mutual forbearance and self, control, could have lived pleasantly together. The evidence does not convince us that defendant’s conduct has been such as to entitle plaintiff to a decree, therefore the decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Aeeirmed.

Mr. Justice Burnett, Mr. Justice Benson and Mr. Justice Harris concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[198]*198Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice McBride.

1. There are no new questions of law raised upon this appeal, and to discuss the evidence would only be. to recount the childish bickerings of two young people who, by the exercise of mutual forbearance and self, control, could have lived pleasantly together. The evidence does not convince us that defendant’s conduct has been such as to entitle plaintiff to a decree, therefore the decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Aeeirmed.

Mr. Justice Burnett, Mr. Justice Benson and Mr. Justice Harris concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 P. 305, 87 Or. 197, 1918 Ore. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bleything-v-bleything-or-1918.