Blevins v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION (CINCINNATI)
DEANNA B.,1 : Case No. 1:22-cv-00604 : Plaintiff, : District Judge Matthew W. McFarland : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry vs. : : COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL : SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, : : Defendant. :
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS2
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). (Doc. No. 15). Specifically, the parties stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney fees in the amount of $5,250.00, and costs in the amount of $0.00, in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims Plaintiff may have under the EAJA in the above case. The award of attorney fees will satisfy all of Plaintiff’s claims for fees, costs, and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in this case. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff, and not her attorney, and
1 See S.D. Ohio General Order 22-01 (“The Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States has recommended that due to significant privacy concerns in social security cases federal courts should refer to claimants only by their first names and last initials.”). 2 See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The notice at the end of this opinion informs the parties of their ability to file objections to this Report and Recommendations within the specified time period.
1 can be offset to satisfy pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the United States under Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). Plaintiff and Defendant move that the Court award Plaintiff EAJA fees of $5,250.00, and costs of $0.00, for a total award of $5,250.00. Additionally, after the Court enters this award, if counsel for the parties can
verify that Plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, Defendant agrees to direct that the award be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly signed by Plaintiff and counsel. Based upon the parties’ stipulation, the undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that:
1. The Court GRANT the parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees Under the EAJA (Doc. No. 15);
2. The Commissioner pay Plaintiff’s attorney fees in the amount of $5,250.00 and $0.00 in costs, for a total award of $5,250.00;
3. Counsel for the parties verify whether Plaintiff owes a preexisting debt to the United States subject to offset, consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff and counsel; and
4. The case remain terminated on the Court’s docket.
s/ Caroline H. Gentry Caroline H. Gentry United States Magistrate Judge 2 NOTICE REGARDING OBJECTIONS
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within FOURTEEN days after being served with this Report and Recommendations. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), this period is extended to SEVENTEEN days because this Report is being served by one of the methods of service listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), (D), (E), or (F). Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring of record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or
such portions of it as all parties may agree upon or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party’s objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947,
949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blevins v. Commissioner of Social Security (Blevins v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.