Bletter v. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
250 N.E.2d 572, 25 N.Y.2d 755, 303 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1215
This text of 250 N.E.2d 572 (Bletter v. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bletter v. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 250 N.E.2d 572, 25 N.Y.2d 755, 303 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1215 (N.Y. 1969).
Opinions
[756]*756Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Bergan and Breitel. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to reverse in the following opinion in which Judge Scileppi concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Bigley v. J & R Music Electronics
269 A.D.2d 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Claim of Richardson v. Fiedler Roofing, Inc.
493 N.E.2d 228 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
250 N.E.2d 572, 25 N.Y.2d 755, 303 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bletter-v-harcourt-brace-world-inc-ny-1969.