Blemaster v. Rockey

Appellate Court of Illinois

Blemaster v. Rockey

200 Ill. App. 320

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 14, 1916

DocketGen. No. 6,149

StatusPublished

This text of 200 Ill. App. 320 (Blemaster v. Rockey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blemaster v. Rockey, 200 Ill. App. 320 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Carnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Assumpsit, action of, § 89*—when evidence sufficient to sustain verdict as to value of property. In an action of assumpsit to recover the market value of residence property conveyed to defendant under an oral contract, which was breached by defendant, evidence held sufficient to sustain the verdict as to the value of such property. 7. Appeal and erbob, § 1447*—when error in refusing leave to file special pleas and in sustaining demurrers to special pleas harmless. Any error in an action of assumpsit in refusing defendant leave to file special pleas and in sustaining demurrers to special pleas is harmless where defendant is not deprived in the introduction of evidence, or in the instructions to the jury, of any legal right to which he is entitled under the facts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Carnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Assumpsit, action of, § 89*—when evidence sufficient to sustain verdict as to value of property. In an action of assumpsit to recover the market value of residence property conveyed to defendant under an oral contract, which was breached by defendant, evidence held sufficient to sustain the verdict as to the value of such property. 7. Appeal and erbob, § 1447*—when error in refusing leave to file special pleas and in sustaining demurrers to special pleas harmless. Any error in an action of assumpsit in refusing defendant leave to file special pleas and in sustaining demurrers to special pleas is harmless where defendant is not deprived in the introduction of evidence, or in the instructions to the jury, of any legal right to which he is entitled under the facts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 Ill. App. 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blemaster-v-rockey-illappct-1916.