Blek v. Wilson
188 N.E. 124, 262 N.Y. 694, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 1224
Opinion
The court on its own motion requests the return of the remittitur herein, and when returned it will be amended to read as follows: “ Judgment of the Appellate Division so far as appealed from reversed and new trial granted on the question of damages, with costs to abide the event.” (See 262 N. Y. 253, 636.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blek v. Wilson, 188 N.E. 124, 262 N.Y. 694, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 1224 (N.Y. 1933).
188 N.E. 124 (Blek v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Destiny USA Holdings, LLC v. Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.
69 A.D.3d 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Madden v. Atkins
151 N.E.2d 73 (New York Court of Appeals, 1958)