Bleemer v. Bleemer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bleemer v. Bleemer

515 So. 2d 1012, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2247, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10206, 1987 WL 4320

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 15, 1987

DocketNo. 86-1029

StatusPublished

This text of 515 So. 2d 1012 (Bleemer v. Bleemer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bleemer v. Bleemer, 515 So. 2d 1012, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2247, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10206, 1987 WL 4320 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order under review is modified in the following respects: (1) the award to the wife of $6,000 lump sum alimony contained in Paragraph 7 of the order (even if considered, as the wife urges, as rehabilitative alimony) is vacated as being unsupported by the evidence since the husband’s failure to pay certain monies awarded at the time of dissolution some five years earlier does not constitute a change of circumstances; and (2) as conceded by the wife, the error in the mathematical computation in Paragraph 1 of the order reduces the indebtedness of the husband to the wife to $42,000 (not, as recited, $43,000) with interest thereon. Except as modified, the order is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order under review is modified in the following respects: (1) the award to the wife of $6,000 lump sum alimony contained in Paragraph 7 of the order (even if considered, as the wife urges, as rehabilitative alimony) is vacated as being unsupported by the evidence since the husband’s failure to pay certain monies awarded at the time of dissolution some five years earlier does not constitute a change of circumstances; and (2) as conceded by the wife, the error in the mathematical computation in Paragraph 1 of the order reduces the indebtedness of the husband to the wife to $42,000 (not, as recited, $43,000) with interest thereon. Except as modified, the order is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

515 So. 2d 1012, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2247, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10206, 1987 WL 4320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bleemer-v-bleemer-fladistctapp-1987.