Bleecker v. Smith

37 How. Pr. 28
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1869
StatusPublished

This text of 37 How. Pr. 28 (Bleecker v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bleecker v. Smith, 37 How. Pr. 28 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1869).

Opinion

Hogeboom, J., said:

I think where the affidavit specifies the county in which the witnesses reside, it complies with the requirements of the law.

I do not regard it as necessaiy to specify the city, village or town. I shall therefore overrule the objection to the affidavits and hear the motion.

Motion heard on the merits and a reference ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 How. Pr. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bleecker-v-smith-nysupct-1869.