Bledsoe v. State

81 S.W.2d 1113, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 608
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 24, 1935
DocketNo. 17549
StatusPublished

This text of 81 S.W.2d 1113 (Bledsoe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bledsoe v. State, 81 S.W.2d 1113, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 608 (Tex. 1935).

Opinion

MORROW, Preéiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The evidence heard in the trial court is not brought forward for review. The motion for new trial presents no matter [1114]*1114which ear\ be appraised in the absence of the facts héard before the trial judge. Moreover, the motion, though verified by the appellant, is controverted by the written statement of state’s counsel under oath.

In the state of the record, we find nothing which would authorize a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 S.W.2d 1113, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bledsoe-v-state-texcrimapp-1935.