Bledsoe v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb ~tates (!Court of §ppeaIs for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit

SHIRLEY J. BLEDSOE, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent, and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Intervenor.

2011-3054

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. CH0353100935-I-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER Upon consideration of the motions to reform the offi- cial caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent and to permit the United States Postal Service to intervene, IT Is ORDERED THAT: BLEDSOE v. MSPB 2 (1) The motions are granted. The revised official cap- tion is reflected above. (2) The respondent and intervenor should calculate their brief due dates from the date of filing ofthis order. FOR THE COURT

APR 06 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Shirley J. Bledsoe Carrie A. Dunsmore, Esq. Calvin Morrow, Esq. FILED s20 '.S. COURT OFAPP£ALS FOil THE FEDERAl. CIRCUIT

APR 06 ZOI1