Bledsoe v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb ~tates (!Court of §ppeaIs for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit

SHIRLEY J. BLEDSOE,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent,

and

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Intervenor.

2011-3054

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. CH0353100935-I-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the motions to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent and to permit the United States Postal Service to intervene, IT Is ORDERED THAT:

BLEDSOE v. MSPB 2 (1) The motions are granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.

(2) The respondent and intervenor should calculate their brief due dates from the date of filing ofthis order.

FOR THE COURT

APR 06 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Shirley J. Bledsoe Carrie A. Dunsmore, Esq. Calvin Morrow, Esq.

FILED

s20 '.S. COURT OFAPP£ALS FOil THE FEDERAl. CIRCUIT

APR 06 ZOI1