Bledsoe v. Banke

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bledsoe v. Banke

376 S.E.2d 686, 258 Ga. 815, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 33

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 19, 1989·No. 46559·Published

Opinion

Marshall, Chief Justice.

This is a direct petition to this Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the Court of Appeals to accept the petitioner’s application for appellate review as timely filed.

There being a specific remedy by certiorari, the right of mandamus does not lie. OCGA §§ 5-6-15; 9-6-20; McClung v. Richardson, 232 Ga. 530 (207 SE2d 472) (1974); Hayes v. Brown, 205 Ga. 234 (52 SE2d 862) (1949).

Petition for writ dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Hunt, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall, Chief Justice.

This is a direct petition to this Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the Court of Appeals to accept the petitioner’s application for appellate review as timely filed.

There being a specific remedy by certiorari, the right of mandamus does not lie. OCGA §§ 5-6-15; 9-6-20; McClung v. Richardson, 232 Ga. 530 (207 SE2d 472) (1974); Hayes v. Brown, 205 Ga. 234 (52 SE2d 862) (1949).

Petition for writ dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Hunt, J., not participating.

Bledsoe v. Banke, 376 S.E.2d 686, 258 Ga. 815, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 33 (Ga. 1989).

Pincite

376 S.E.2d 686 (Bledsoe v. Banke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related