Bleakley Transportation Co. v. Tomkins Cove Stone Co.

224 A.D. 706

This text of 224 A.D. 706 (Bleakley Transportation Co. v. Tomkins Cove Stone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bleakley Transportation Co. v. Tomkins Cove Stone Co., 224 A.D. 706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the allegations of the paragraph stricken out from the answer by the order appealed from, the defendant would be entitled to show at the trial a due legal assignment by the plaintiff of the claim upon which the action is based, as distinguished from the equitable right of subrogation. In this event there may be no right in the plaintiff to maintain the action. The defense that the plaintiff is not the real party in interest must be pleaded in order to be available to the defendant upon the trial. (Smith v. Hall, 67 N. Y. 48, 50.) The order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to strike out denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and O’Malley, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. . Hall
67 N.Y. 48 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D. 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bleakley-transportation-co-v-tomkins-cove-stone-co-nyappdiv-1928.