B.L.D. v. State
This text of 2015 UT App 82 (B.L.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1072]*1072Decision
T1 B.L.D. appeals the juvenile court's dis-positional order imposing thirty days of detention as a result of an adjudication of curfew violation. This case is before the court on the State's motion for summary reversal and remand, which the State filed in lieu of a brief. We grant that motion.
12 B.L.D.'s appeal raises the single issue of whether the juvenile court erred in ordering thirty days of detention, suspended, following an adjudication 'of curfew violation because the curfew violation is an offense that is ineligible for detention. We review a trial court's interpretation of a statute for correctness. See State v. Graham, 2011 UT App 332, ¶ 14, 263 P.3d 569 ("Questions of statutory interpretation are matters of law, which we review for correctness."). The State concedes that the juvenile court erred by imposing detention for thirty days for a curfew violation, even if suspended, and agrees that the relief requested by B.L.D. on appeal should be granted.
T3 Under Utah law, a juvenile court may order detention only for "an act which if committed by an adult would be a criminal offense" or for "contempt of court." Utah Code Ann. § 78A-6-117(@)(F(i) (LexisNexis 2012). The curfew violation B.L.D. admitted is a juvenile status offense that applies only to a minor under the age of sixteen.1 See Davis County Code § 9.08.010 ("It is unlawful for any minor under the age of sixteen .(16) years to be in or on any public street, park, square or any public place between the hours of eleven p.m. and daylight."). Because detention may only be ordered after adjudication for "an act which if committed by an adult would be a criminal offense" or for "contempt of court", the juvenile court erred in ordering thirty days of detention, suspended.
14 Accordingly, we grant the State's motion to reverse the juvenile court's disposi-tional order committing B.L.D. to detention for thirty days, suspended, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this decision.2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 UT App 82, 347 P.3d 1071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bld-v-state-utahctapp-2015.