Blayton v. Ford Motor Credit Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Blayton v. Ford Motor Credit Company

164 S.E.2d 262, 118 Ga. App. 517, 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1094, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 954

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 20, 1968

Docket43855

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 164 S.E.2d 262 (Blayton v. Ford Motor Credit Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blayton v. Ford Motor Credit Company, 164 S.E.2d 262, 118 Ga. App. 517, 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1094, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 954 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

Where, as in the case sub judice, the conditional sale contract named the company the defendant was representing but did not show that he signed the instrument in a representative capacity, the trial judge sitting without a jury did not err in finding the defendant personally liable. Code Ann. § 109A-3 — 403 (Ga. L. 1962, pp. 156, 257).

On condition that the part of the judgment in excess of $2,581.54 principal and $333.15 attorney’s fees be written off, the judgment is affirmed; otherwise reversed.

Judgment affirmed on condition.

Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI