Blayton v. Ford Motor Credit Company

164 S.E.2d 262, 118 Ga. App. 517, 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1094, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 954
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 20, 1968·No. 43855·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

Where, as in the case sub judice, the conditional sale contract named the company the defendant was representing but did not show that he signed the instrument in a representative capacity, the trial judge sitting without a jury did not err in finding the defendant personally liable. Code Ann. § 109A-3 — 403 (Ga. L. 1962, pp. 156, 257).

On condition that the part of the judgment in excess of $2,581.54 principal and $333.15 attorney’s fees be written off, the judgment is affirmed; otherwise reversed.

Judgment affirmed on condition.

Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blayton v. Ford Motor Credit Company, 164 S.E.2d 262, 118 Ga. App. 517, 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1094, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 954 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

164 S.E.2d 262 (Blayton v. Ford Motor Credit Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Associated Services of Accountable Professionals, Ltd. v. Workman
593 S.E.2d 882 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2004)
Avery v. Whitworth
414 S.E.2d 725 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
A. L. Jackson Chevrolet, Inc. v. Oxley
1977 OK 85 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1977)