Blaylock v. Kistner
155 S.E. 536, 42 Ga. App. 165, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 273
Opinion
Under all the facts of the case as disclosed by the record, the court’s judgment upon the written motion to dismiss the case was not error for any reason assigned. See, in this connection, Park’s Code, § 5390; Dean v. Donalson, 2 Ga. App. 462 (58 S. E. 679) ; Jones v. Eubanks, 86 Ga. 616 (12 S. E. 1065).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blaylock v. Kistner, 155 S.E. 536, 42 Ga. App. 165, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 273 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).
155 S.E. 536 (Blaylock v. Kistner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Eubanks
12 S.E. 1065 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1891)
Dean v. Donalson
58 S.E. 679 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)