Blaylock v. Jensen

California Court of Appeal

Blaylock v. Jensen

113 P.2d 258, 44 Cal. App. 2d 853

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 16, 1941

DocketCiv. No. 13002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 113 P.2d 258 (Blaylock v. Jensen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blaylock v. Jensen, 113 P.2d 258, 44 Cal. App. 2d 853 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

WOOD, Acting P. J.

A judgment in the sum of $500 was rendered by the superior court in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Mabel Coates. Thereafter plaintiff filed her memorandum of costs and disbursements and the defendant, objecting to certain 'items, filed her motion to have the costs taxed by the court. The court made an order striking various items claimed by plaintiff as proper disbursements. Prom this order plaintiff has appealed.

On a separate appeal, which was prosecuted by defendant from the judgment in plaintiff’s favor, we have this day entered an order reversing the judgment for $500. The issue has therefore become moot.

The appeal is dismissed.

McComb, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI