Blaylock v. Hackel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Blaylock v. Hackel

142 S.E. 882, 166 Ga. 160, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 244

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 14, 1928

DocketNo. 6381

StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.E. 882 (Blaylock v. Hackel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blaylock v. Hackel, 142 S.E. 882, 166 Ga. 160, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 244 (Ga. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

This was an equitable petition seeking to reform a deed. The exception is to a judgment overruling a motion for new trial, one of the grounds of which complained that the court erred in directing a verdict. Held:

1. The evidence did not demand direction of a verdict. On the contrary there was the issue of fact, to be determined by the jury, of whether or not the land conveyed by the deed was sold by the acre or by the tract.

2. The grounds of the motion contained in the amendment neither show error nor require mention.

Judgment reversed.

All the Jusliees eonour.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI