Blaydes v. William Glum & Sons

3 Ky. Op. 706, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 251
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 11, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ky. Op. 706 (Blaydes v. William Glum & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blaydes v. William Glum & Sons, 3 Ky. Op. 706, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 251 (Ky. Ct. App. 1870).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin:

It is not alleged in the petition that the plaintiffs were the owners or holders of the bill, or in any manner interested in recovering a judgment thereon. The petition does not, therefore, state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and this objection was not waived by the failure of the defendants to demur or answer in the court below, but as has been repeatedly held, the objection is available by appeal to this court. The judgment must, therefore, be reversed.

Turner & Cornelison, for appellant. O. S. Tenney, for appellee.

As to the motion to discharge the supersedeas, the bond being deemed insufficient, and the appellants not offering to give another with sufficient surety, the supersedeas will be discharged.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings, the plaintiffs being allowed to amend their petition. And the supersedeas is discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Ky. Op. 706, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blaydes-v-william-glum-sons-kyctapp-1870.