Blaxton v. State
Opinion
Because the trial court properly treated Appellant’s “Petition for Writ of Mandamus: Contesting Judge Michael G. Allen’s Prejudice” as a motion for disqualification, we treat Appellant’s appeal as a writ of prohibition. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c); see also Sutton v. State, 975 So.2d 1073, 1076 (Fla.2008) (“[Pjrohibition is ... clearly recognized as the proper avenue for immediate review of whether a motion to disqualify a trial judge has been correctly denied.”).
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
85 So. 3d 1150 (Blaxton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.