Blau v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Blau v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

94 N.Y.S. 1139

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 94 N.Y.S. 1139 (Blau v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blau v. Interurban Street Railway Co., 94 N.Y.S. 1139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The verdict of the jury was against the weight of evidence. The evi-’ dence clearly shows that the accident happened to the plaintiff through the negligence of the driver of the wagon that collided with the car of the defendant, and not through the negligence of the defendant’s servants. The judgment and order are reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The verdict of the jury was against the weight of evidence. The evi-’ dence clearly shows that the accident happened to the plaintiff through the negligence of the driver of the wagon that collided with the car of the defendant, and not through the negligence of the defendant’s servants. The judgment and order are reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 N.Y.S. 1139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blau-v-interurban-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1905.