Home/Supreme Court/Blau v. Factor

Blau v. Factor

382 U.S. 892, 86 S. Ct. 180
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 25, 1965
DocketNo. 140
StatusPublished
Cited by36 cases

This text of 382 U.S. 892 (Blau v. Factor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blau v. Factor, 382 U.S. 892, 86 S. Ct. 180 (1965).

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to submit additional authority granted. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

T-Bar Inc. v. Chatterjee
693 F. Supp. 1 (S.D. New York, 1988)
Seinfeld v. Hospital Corp. of America
685 F. Supp. 1057 (N.D. Illinois, 1988)
Arrow Distributing Corp. v. Richard A. Baumgartner
783 F.2d 1274 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
Colan v. Continental Telecom, Inc.
616 F. Supp. 1521 (S.D. New York, 1985)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,849 John R. Riseman v. Orion Research, Inc.
749 F.2d 915 (First Circuit, 1984)
City of Angels Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Fidelity Television, Inc., Rko General, Inc., Intervenors
745 F.2d 656 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Kay v. Scientex Corp.
719 F.2d 1009 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
Harry Kay v. Scientex Corporation
719 F.2d 1009 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
National Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. Small
680 F.2d 83 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,746 National Medical Enterprises, Inc., a Nevada Corporation v. Sherwin A. Small, National Medical Enterprises, Inc., a Nevada Corporation v. Paul F. Avard
680 F.2d 83 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Portnoy v. Memorex Corp.
667 F.2d 1281 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Portnoy v. Memorex Corporation
667 F.2d 1281 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Whittaker v. Whittaker Corp.
639 F.2d 516 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
William R. Whittaker, on Behalf of Himself, and of the Estate of Beulah Whittaker v. Whittaker Corporation, a California Corporation, William R. Whittaker, on Behalf of Himself, and of the Estate of Beulah Whittaker v. Whittaker Corporation, a California Corporation
639 F.2d 516 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
Matas v. Siess
467 F. Supp. 217 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Prager Ex Rel. Gable Industries, Inc. v. Sylvestri
449 F. Supp. 425 (S.D. New York, 1978)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,704 Richard Morales v. Mapco, Inc., and Donald B. Ross
541 F.2d 233 (Tenth Circuit, 1976)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,811 Provident Securities Company, a California Corporation v. Foremost-Mckesson, Inc., a Maryland Corporation
506 F.2d 601 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Tv 9, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Televisioncorporation, Intervenor. Comint Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Tv 9, Inc. And Mid-Floridatelevision Corporation, Intervenors. Central Nine Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Tv 9, Inc. And Mid-Floridatelevision Corporation, Intervenors. Florida Heartland Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Tv 9, Inc. And Mid-Floridatelevision Corporation, Intervenors
495 F.2d 929 (D.C. Circuit, 1974)
TV 9, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
495 F.2d 929 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
382 U.S. 892, 86 S. Ct. 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blau-v-factor-scotus-1965.