Blatz v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blatz v. City of New York

9 A.D.2d 614, 193 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7176

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 614 (Blatz v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blatz v. City of New York, 9 A.D.2d 614, 193 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points, upon condition that the appellants serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points on the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and file 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellants’ points with this court on or before December 8, 1959, with notice of argument for the January 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points, upon condition that the appellants serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points on the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and file 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellants’ points with this court on or before December 8, 1959, with notice of argument for the January 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 614, 193 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blatz-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1959.