BLATTEL v. Hayes

283 S.W.3d 828, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 748, 2009 WL 1523276
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 2, 2009·No. ED 91308·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Blattel (Father) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting Diana *829 Hayes’ Motion to Modify Child Support and increasing Father’s child support obligation, and denying Father’s Motion to Emancipate the Child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. In re Marriage of Copeland, 850 S.W.2d 422, 424-25 (Mo.App. E.D.1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLATTEL v. Hayes, 283 S.W.3d 828, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 748, 2009 WL 1523276 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

283 S.W.3d 828 (BLATTEL v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Underwood v. Cress
283 S.W.3d 828 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)