Blatch v. State
This text of 719 So. 2d 965 (Blatch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Edward A. Blatch timely appeals from an adjudication of guilt and sentences imposed for sale or delivery of cocaine within one thousand feet of a school, and for possession of cocaine. He was sentenced as an habitual offender on the sale and delivery count to a twenty-year prison term with a three-year mandatory minimum, and on the possession count to a concurrent term of ten years, also as an habitual offender. He correctly contends that his sentence as an habitual felony offender for possession of cocaine is not authorized by section 775.084(l)(a)3, Florida Statutes (1997), because that section does not permit a violation of section 893.131 to serve as a predicate conviction.2
Although he did not object at trial or move to correct his sentence timely, he may still challenge it on direct appeal as illegal because the ten-year enhanced sentence exceeds both the statutory maximum pursuant to sections 893.13(6)(a) and 775.082(3)(d) (5 years), and the maximum guidelines sentence (7.6 years). See Hyden v. State, 715 So.2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
Furthermore, and as the state correctly concedes, there is a scrivener’s error on the face of Blatch’s judgment indicating that he pled nolo contendere to the charges, rather than having been found guilty by the trial court. Although he did not move to correct this error timely below, because we are reversing his sentence on the possession charge, we instruct the court on remand to also correct this error. As to Blatch’s remaining point on appeal concerning the witness’ lay opinion regarding the appearance of appellant’s tooth, we affirm.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
719 So. 2d 965, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12904, 1998 WL 712891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blatch-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.