Blatch v. Port Jefferson Electric Light Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blatch v. Port Jefferson Electric Light Co.

176 A.D. 928

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 176 A.D. 928 (Blatch v. Port Jefferson Electric Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blatch v. Port Jefferson Electric Light Co., 176 A.D. 928 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant’s insolvency and sale of its effects, with return of executions unsatisfied on j udgments recovered for death, called for administration of its assets by the court through a receiver. The order of December 8, 1916, appointing Mr. Belford as such receiver, is accordingly affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The prior injunction order obtained by plaintiff Blatch, having served its purpose to prevent a premature disposition of the assets of the dissolved corporation, is also affirmed, without costs. On neither appeal has this court before it the necessary parties to pass on any questions of priorities which may hereafter be raised by appropriate steps in the sequestration proceedings. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant’s insolvency and sale of its effects, with return of executions unsatisfied on j udgments recovered for death, called for administration of its assets by the court through a receiver. The order of December 8, 1916, appointing Mr. Belford as such receiver, is accordingly affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The prior injunction order obtained by plaintiff Blatch, having served its purpose to prevent a premature disposition of the assets of the dissolved corporation, is also affirmed, without costs. On neither appeal has this court before it the necessary parties to pass on any questions of priorities which may hereafter be raised by appropriate steps in the sequestration proceedings. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 A.D. 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blatch-v-port-jefferson-electric-light-co-nyappdiv-1917.