Blassingame v. Trihealth Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Derrick D. Blassingame, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:22cv306 Trihealth, Inc., et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on July 6, 2022 (Doc. 4). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 4) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 4) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of this Order adopting the Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny Plaintiff leave to
appeal in forma pauperis. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge 1 United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blassingame v. Trihealth Inc. (Blassingame v. Trihealth Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.