Blasich v. Dennison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blasich v. Dennison

29 A.D.3d 1189, 813 N.Y.S.2d 923

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 A.D.3d 1189 (Blasich v. Dennison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blasich v. Dennison, 29 A.D.3d 1189, 813 N.Y.S.2d 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Spargo, J.), entered July 15, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

[1190]*1190Since the March 2004 determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release again has been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent reappearance before the Board in March 2006, the instant appeal is now moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Marnell v New York State Div. of Parole, 20 AD3d 805 [2005]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Spargo, J.), entered July 15, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

[1190]*1190Since the March 2004 determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release again has been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent reappearance before the Board in March 2006, the instant appeal is now moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Marnell v New York State Div. of Parole, 20 AD3d 805 [2005]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.3d 1189, 813 N.Y.S.2d 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blasich-v-dennison-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack