Blasi v. Marine Midland Bank of Southeastern New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blasi v. Marine Midland Bank of Southeastern New York

59 A.D.2d 932, 399 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14160

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 28, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 59 A.D.2d 932 (Blasi v. Marine Midland Bank of Southeastern New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blasi v. Marine Midland Bank of Southeastern New York, 59 A.D.2d 932, 399 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages on the theory that defendants enabled trustees to waste the assets of a trust, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 8, 1977, which denied plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3133 to strike certain interrogatories. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted and interrogatories stricken, without prejudice to the propounding of proper interrogatories by defendant. The interrogatories, consisting of 49 pages, are unduly prolix, vexatious and unreasonably oppressive. Rather than burden this court by making a piecemeal determination of which interrogatories are material and necessary pursuant to CPLR 3101, the proper remedy is a vacatur of the entire demand (see Heimowitz v Handler, Kleiman, Sukenik & Segal, P. C., 51 AD2d 702). Although, in order to reduce delay, we encourage a liberal disclosure of facts bearing on the controversy which will assist a litigant in the preparation for trial, the interrogatories posed by the defendant did not satisfy or meet such needs (see Allen v Crowell-Collier Pub. Co., 21 NY2d 403). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages on the theory that defendants enabled trustees to waste the assets of a trust, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 8, 1977, which denied plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3133 to strike certain interrogatories. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted and interrogatories stricken, without prejudice to the propounding of proper interrogatories by defendant. The interrogatories, consisting of 49 pages, are unduly prolix, vexatious and unreasonably oppressive. Rather than burden this court by making a piecemeal determination of which interrogatories are material and necessary pursuant to CPLR 3101, the proper remedy is a vacatur of the entire demand (see Heimowitz v Handler, Kleiman, Sukenik & Segal, P. C., 51 AD2d 702). Although, in order to reduce delay, we encourage a liberal disclosure of facts bearing on the controversy which will assist a litigant in the preparation for trial, the interrogatories posed by the defendant did not satisfy or meet such needs (see Allen v Crowell-Collier Pub. Co., 21 NY2d 403). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 932, 399 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blasi-v-marine-midland-bank-of-southeastern-new-york-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack