Blasi v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blasi v. Gonzalez

231 A.D.2d 482, 647 N.Y.S.2d 101, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8857

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 9, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D.2d 482 (Blasi v. Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blasi v. Gonzalez, 231 A.D.2d 482, 647 N.Y.S.2d 101, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Newmark, J.), dated June 9, 1994, which denied the plaintiffs’ motion, in effect, to reargue their prior motion to renew and reargue the defendants’ mo[483]*483tion, inter alia, for summary judgment, which was determined by an order of the same court, dated April 4, 1994.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 9, 1994, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Thompson, J. P., Altman, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Newmark, J.), dated June 9, 1994, which denied the plaintiffs’ motion, in effect, to reargue their prior motion to renew and reargue the defendants’ mo[483]*483tion, inter alia, for summary judgment, which was determined by an order of the same court, dated April 4, 1994.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 9, 1994, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Thompson, J. P., Altman, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D.2d 482, 647 N.Y.S.2d 101, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blasi-v-gonzalez-nyappdiv-1996.