Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Blanton v. State

Blanton v. State

98 So. 3d 722, 2012 WL 4748114, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16980
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 5, 2012
DocketNo. 1D12-0238
StatusPublished

This text of 98 So. 3d 722 (Blanton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blanton v. State, 98 So. 3d 722, 2012 WL 4748114, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16980 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Cannon v. State, 92 So.3d 292, 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(g) “only applies prior to sentencing” and that Cox v. State, 35 So.3d 47 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), “does not stand for the proposition that a defendant has a unilateral right to withdraw from a plea years after he has been sentenced in accordance with that plea, if the trial court failed to formally accept it”); Campbell v. State, 75 So.3d 757, 759 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (holding “rule 3.172(g) only applies prior to sentencing”).

BENTON, C.J., THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cox v. State
35 So. 3d 47 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Campbell v. State
75 So. 3d 757 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Cannon v. State
92 So. 3d 292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 So. 3d 722, 2012 WL 4748114, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanton-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.