Blanton v. Security Savings Ass'n

14 Ohio Law. Abs. 111, 1933 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1689
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided January 19, 1933·No. No 1143·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ALLREAD, PJ.

We have carefully read the record and we think it is clear that by the deed from the Starks to the local Association the Association took the real estate. The amount of the consideration to be attributed to the loss upon the sale of the real estate was to be determined. When the real estate was conveyed by the deed from the Starks to it, they must have assumed that the value of the real estate must have been equal to the mortgage. There is no showing to the contrary and that would necessarily be the presumption in which this court must indulge.

We are of the view that the opinion of Judge Snediker holding in favor of the plaintiffs as to the ownership of the $1300.00 certificate is correct and should be followed by this court. The same judgment is hereby rendered as was rendered in the court below.

HORNBECK and KUNKLE, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blanton v. Security Savings Ass'n, 14 Ohio Law. Abs. 111, 1933 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1689 (Ohio Ct. App. 1933).

14 Ohio Law. Abs. 111 (Blanton v. Security Savings Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Procaccino v. Elberon Bldg. & Loan Ass'n
241 N.E.2d 758 (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County, 1968)