Blanton v. Merit Systems Protection Board
This text of Blanton v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Blanton v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-3332
ALVIN M. BLANTON,
Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
Respondent.
John M. Poti, Law Office of John M. Poti, of Prattville, Alabama, argued for petitioner.
Calvin M. Morrow, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were B. Chad Bungard, General Counsel, and Jeffrey A. Gauger, Attorney.
Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-3332
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board
in CASE NO AT0752080052-I-1.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (BRYSON, CLEVENGER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.)
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R.36
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: April 10, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Blanton v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanton-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2009.