Blanton v. . Lawing

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Blanton v. . Lawing

4 S.E.2d 438, 216 N.C. 794, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 74

DecidedSeptember 27, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 4 S.E.2d 438 (Blanton v. . Lawing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blanton v. . Lawing, 4 S.E.2d 438, 216 N.C. 794, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 74 (N.C. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. When the plaintiff had introduced his evidence and rested his case the court allowed defendant’s motion for judgment as in ease of nonsuit. C. S., 567. We concur in the ruling of the court upon the theory that there was no evidence of actionable negligence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. When the plaintiff had introduced his evidence and rested his case the court allowed defendant’s motion for judgment as in ease of nonsuit. C. S., 567. We concur in the ruling of the court upon the theory that there was no evidence of actionable negligence.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 S.E.2d 438, 216 N.C. 794, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanton-v-lawing-nc-1939.